Hi Joe,

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:30:34 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c     |    2 +-
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> index 9c8b6d5..c09b036 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int xfer_write(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned 
> char *buf, int length)
>   * Generic i2c master transfer entrypoint.
>   *
>   * Note: We do not use Atmel's feature of storing the "internal device 
> address".
> - * Instead the "internal device address" has to be written using a seperate
> + * Instead the "internal device address" has to be written using a separate
>   * i2c message.
>   * 
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-September/024411.html
>   */
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c 
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c
> index 0ab4f26..7813127 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static s32 i2c_powermac_smbus_xfer( struct i2c_adapter*     
> adap,
>               break;
>  
>       /* Note that these are broken vs. the expected smbus API where
> -      * on reads, the lenght is actually returned from the function,
> +      * on reads, the length is actually returned from the function,
>        * but I think the current API makes no sense and I don't want
>        * any driver that I haven't verified for correctness to go
>        * anywhere near a pmac i2c bus anyway ...

Applied, thank you.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to