Hello, On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:54:49PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > @@ -4909,8 +4909,9 @@ static void unbind_workers(int cpu) > > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); > > + /* don't rely on the scheduler to force break affinity for us. > */
I'm not sure this comment is helpful. The comment may make sense right now while the scheduler behavior is changing but down the line it's not gonna make whole lot of sense. > for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) > - WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, > cpu_active_mask) < 0); > + WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, > cpu_possible_mask) < 0); > > mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex); Thanks. -- tejun
