On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 14:42, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:30:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > FWIW, I recently noticed we're not being Cc'ed on patches for this > > stuff, so how about we do something like the below? > > > > Anybody holler if they don't agree with the letter assigned, or if they > > feel they've been left out entirely and want in on the 'fun' :-) > > > > --- > > Subject: jump_label/static_call: Add MAINTAINERS > > From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > > > > These files don't appear to have a MAINTAINERS entry and as such > > patches miss being seen by people who know this code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -16766,6 +16766,18 @@ M: Ion Badulescu <[email protected]> > > S: Odd Fixes > > F: drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire* > > > > +STATIC BRANCH/CALL > > +M: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > > +M: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> > > +M: Jason Baron <[email protected]> > > +R: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > > +R: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > > +S: Supported > > F: arch/*/include/asm/jump_label*.h > F: arch/*/include/asm/static_call*.h > F: arch/*/kernel/jump_label.c > F: arch/*/kernel/static_call.c > > These too? >
Yes, that makes sense. Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
