Re: [PATCH -next] ti/fapll: Delete useless kfree code

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Zheng Yongjun (2020-12-16 05:05:34)
> The parameter of kfree function is NULL, so kfree code is useless, delete it.

Not always though. Sometimes it is non-NULL and this code avoids a goto.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongj...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> index 95e36ba64acc..a61d69159e9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> @@ -523,7 +523,6 @@ static struct clk * __init ti_fapll_synth_setup(struct 
> fapll_data *fd,
>         return clk_register(NULL, &synth->hw);
>  
>  free:
> -       kfree(synth);
>         kfree(init);
>  
>         return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);