On 2020-12-18 14:24, Stanley Chu wrote:
Hi Can,
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 14:20 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Hi,
> This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not
> change any functionality.
>
> This series is based on Can's series "Three changes related with UFS
> clock scaling" in 5.10/scsi-fixes branch in Martin's tree.
>
Hi Stanley,
Thanks for noticing my changes, will you review them?
I see customers manipulte UFS scaling related sysfs
nodes more often than before, so we may want to fix it asap.
I have gave my review tag in all patches in this series : )
Thanks,
Stanley Chu
Hi Stanley,
oops, just saw it - I opened the wrong series.
I will push a new version which incorporates your comments soon.
Since the new changes would only be some words in ufshcd.h, so you
won't need to rebase.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Regards,
Can Guo.
> However this series may not be required to be merged to 5.10. The
> choice of base branch is simply making these patches easy to be
> reviewed because this series is based on clk-scaling fixes by Can. If
> this series is decided not being merged to 5.10, then I would rebase
> it to 5.11/scsi-queue.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Refactor ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
> - Change function name from ufshcd_clk_scaling_pm() to
> ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
> - Refine patch titles
>
> Stanley Chu (4):
> scsi: ufs: Refactor cancelling clkscaling works
> scsi: ufs: Remove redundant null checking of devfreq instance
> scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clk-scaling feature
> scsi: ufs: Fix build warning by incorrect function description
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
