On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 08:09:55AM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:40:04 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
(...) > > > .name = "max8997_pmic", > > > .type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY, > > > @@ -170,6 +237,33 @@ static int max8997_battery_probe(struct > > > platform_device *pdev) > > > return PTR_ERR(charger->battery); > > > } > > > > > > + charger->reg = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "charger"); > > > > The code looks good but isn't it breaking all existing platforms? > > So there is 2 other DTS in the kernel sources that are using MAX8997 > pmic: > - Insignal Origen evaluation board > - Samsung Trats > Non of them have charging regulators. But still the power supply was probing on them (if not the error you mentioned). Now, the charger will fail. > Also probing of the charger has been failing for long time because of > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201109194251.562203-2-timon.ba...@protonmail.com/ > but that seems to land in 5.11. That's a good argument supporting introduced breakage. Use it in commit message. Don't hide such information. > That being said, I guess I could make extcon and charger-supply > optional if you prefer. Since at least two boards will loose now power supply, I don't think you have a choice. Best regards, Krzysztof
