On 18.12.20 19:35, Donald Buczek wrote:
On 18.12.20 16:35, Brian Foster wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:30:37PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote:
On 17.12.20 20:43, Brian Foster wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote:
Dear xfs developer,
I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs
filesystems on md raid6 raids.
The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository with two
threads in parallel on each filesystem.
After about on hour, the processes to one filesystem (md1) blocked, 30 minutes
later the process to the other filesystem (md0) did.
root 7322 2167 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:06 cp -a
/jbod/M8068/scratch/linux /jbod/M8068/scratch/1/linux.018.TMP
root 7329 2169 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:05 cp -a
/jbod/M8068/scratch/linux /jbod/M8068/scratch/2/linux.019.TMP
root 13856 2170 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:08 cp -a
/jbod/M8067/scratch/linux /jbod/M8067/scratch/2/linux.028.TMP
root 13899 2168 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:05 cp -a
/jbod/M8067/scratch/linux /jbod/M8067/scratch/1/linux.027.TMP
Do you have any indication of whether these workloads actually hung or
just became incredibly slow?
There is zero progress. iostat doesn't show any I/O on any of the block devices
(md or member)
Some info from the system (all stack traces, slabinfo) is available here:
https://owww.molgen.mpg.de/~buczek/2020-12-16.info.txt
It stands out, that there are many (549 for md0, but only 10 for md1)
"xfs-conv" threads all with stacks like this
[<0>] xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc/0x7c0
[<0>] __xfs_trans_commit+0xab/0x320
[<0>] xfs_iomap_write_unwritten+0xcb/0x2e0
[<0>] xfs_end_ioend+0xc6/0x110
[<0>] xfs_end_io+0xad/0xe0
[<0>] process_one_work+0x1dd/0x3e0
[<0>] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3b0
[<0>] kthread+0x118/0x130
[<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc is
xfs_log_commit_cil()
xlog_cil_push_background(log)
xlog_wait(&cil->xc_push_wait, &cil->xc_push_lock);
This looks like the transaction commit throttling code. That was
introduced earlier this year in v5.7 via commit 0e7ab7efe7745 ("xfs:
Throttle commits on delayed background CIL push"). The purpose of that
change was to prevent the CIL from growing too large. FWIW, I don't
recall that being a functional problem so it should be possible to
simply remove that blocking point and see if that avoids the problem or
if we simply stall out somewhere else, if you wanted to give that a
test.
Will do. Before trying with this commit reverted, I will repeat the test
without any change to see if the problem is reproducible at all.
I'm now able to reliably reproduce the deadlock with a little less complex
setup (e.g. with only one filesystem involved). One key to that was to run the
test against a freshly created filesystem (mkfs).
And, yes, you are right: When I revert ef565ab8cc2e ("xfs: Throttle commits on delayed
background CIL push") and 7ee6dfa2a245 ("xfs: fix use-after-free on CIL context on
shutdown") the deadlock seems to be gone.
Best
Donald
