From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.sile...@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit cda286f0715c82f8117e166afd42cca068876dde ]

io_uring_cancel_task_requests() doesn't imply that the ring is going
away, it may continue to work well after that. The problem is that it
sets ->cq_overflow_flushed effectively disabling the CQ overflow feature

Split setting cq_overflow_flushed from flush, and do the first one only
on exit. It's ok in terms of cancellations because there is a
io_uring->in_idle check in __io_cqring_fill_event().

It also fixes a race with setting ->cq_overflow_flushed in
io_uring_cancel_task_requests, whuch's is not atomic and a part of a
bitmask with other flags. Though, the only other flag that's not set
during init is drain_next, so it's not as bad for sane architectures.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.sile...@gmail.com>
Fixes: 0f2122045b946 ("io_uring: don't rely on weak ->files references")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b9d3209a5f9de..e9219841923cc 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1641,10 +1641,6 @@ static bool io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx 
*ctx, bool force,
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
 
-       /* if force is set, the ring is going away. always drop after that */
-       if (force)
-               ctx->cq_overflow_flushed = 1;
-
        cqe = NULL;
        list_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &ctx->cq_overflow_list, compl.list) {
                if (tsk && req->task != tsk)
@@ -8378,6 +8374,8 @@ static void io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill(struct io_ring_ctx 
*ctx)
 {
        mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
        percpu_ref_kill(&ctx->refs);
+       /* if force is set, the ring is going away. always drop after that */
+       ctx->cq_overflow_flushed = 1;
        if (ctx->rings)
                io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, NULL, NULL);
        mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to