Hello Jaswinder, > Is it possible to run softirq-threads or IRQs as a non-realtime tasks > in RT kernel.
Currently the answer is no. (Unless overruled from userspace) I did not take this requirement into account. So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible? I cannot imagine a purpose in which that is wanted, it would cause unpredictable interrupt handling, and I can imagine that many drivers/devices will not like that. The purpose is usually to spread the threads across several priorities, to create room for some RT-process to become more important than an IRQ that generates large latencies, and each RT-system designer shall divide the priorities different, due to different system requirements. Kind Regards, Remy 2007/12/20, Jaswinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The RT-patch originally creates all its softirq-threads at > > priority 50. > > Is it possible to run softirq-threads or IRQs as a non-realtime tasks > in RT kernel. > > If yes, then how. > > Thank you, > > Jaswinder Singh. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
