From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>

commit b1b6b5a30dce872f500dc43f067cba8e7f86fc7d upstream.

For cancelling io_uring requests it needs either to be able to run
currently enqueued task_works or having it shut down by that moment.
Otherwise io_uring_cancel_files() may be waiting for requests that won't
ever complete.

Go with the first way and do cancellations before setting PF_EXITING and
so before putting the task_work infrastructure into a transition state
where task_work_run() would better not be called.

Cc: [email protected] # 5.5+
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/file.c     |    2 --
 kernel/exit.c |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/close_range.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
-#include <linux/io_uring.h>
 
 unsigned int sysctl_nr_open __read_mostly = 1024*1024;
 unsigned int sysctl_nr_open_min = BITS_PER_LONG;
@@ -453,7 +452,6 @@ void exit_files(struct task_struct *tsk)
        struct files_struct * files = tsk->files;
 
        if (files) {
-               io_uring_files_cancel(files);
                task_lock(tsk);
                tsk->files = NULL;
                task_unlock(tsk);
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
 #include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/rcuwait.h>
 #include <linux/compat.h>
+#include <linux/io_uring.h>
 
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -762,6 +763,7 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
                schedule();
        }
 
+       io_uring_files_cancel(tsk->files);
        exit_signals(tsk);  /* sets PF_EXITING */
 
        /* sync mm's RSS info before statistics gathering */


Reply via email to