On 06.01.2021 01:58, Yang Shi wrote:
> Now shrinker's nr_deferred is per memcg for memcg aware shrinkers, add to 
> parent's
> corresponding nr_deferred when memcg offline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  1 +
>  mm/memcontrol.c            |  1 +
>  mm/vmscan.c                | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 5599082df623..d1e52e916cc2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -1586,6 +1586,7 @@ extern int memcg_alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg);
>  extern void memcg_free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>  extern void memcg_set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                                  int nid, int shrinker_id);
> +extern void memcg_reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>  #else
>  #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled 0
>  static inline void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk) { };
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 126f1fd550c8..19e555675582 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5284,6 +5284,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct 
> cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>       page_counter_set_low(&memcg->memory, 0);
>  
>       memcg_offline_kmem(memcg);
> +     memcg_reparent_shrinker_deferred(memcg);
>       wb_memcg_offline(memcg);
>  
>       drain_all_stock(memcg);
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index d9795fb0f1c5..71056057d26d 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -396,6 +396,35 @@ static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, 
> struct shrinker *shrinker,
>       return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]);
>  }
>  
> +void memcg_reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +     int i, nid;
> +     long nr;
> +     struct mem_cgroup *parent;
> +     struct memcg_shrinker_info *child_info, *parent_info;
> +
> +     parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
> +     if (!parent)
> +             parent = root_mem_cgroup;
> +
> +     /* Prevent from concurrent shrinker_info expand */
> +     down_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +     for_each_node(nid) {
> +             child_info = rcu_dereference_protected(
> +                                     memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
> +                                     true);
> +             parent_info = rcu_dereference_protected(
> +                                     parent->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
> +                                     true);

Simple assignment can't take such lots of space, we have to do something with 
that.

Number of these

        rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, true)

became too big, and we can't allow every of them takes 3 lines.

We should introduce a short helper to dereferrence this, so we will be able to 
give
out attention to really difficult logic instead of wasting it on parsing this.

                child_info = memcg_shrinker_info(memcg, nid);
or
                child_info = memcg_shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);

Both of them fit in single line.

struct memcg_shrinker_info *memcg_shrinker_info_protected(
                                        struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
{
        return rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
                                         lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
}


> +             for (i = 0; i < shrinker_nr_max; i++) {
> +                     nr = atomic_long_read(&child_info->nr_deferred[i]);
> +                     atomic_long_add(nr,
> +                                     &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]);

Why new line is here? In case of you merge it up, it will be even shorter then 
previous line.

> +             }
> +     }
> +     up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +}
> +
>  static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>  {
>       return sc->target_mem_cgroup;
> 

Reply via email to