Hi Tom, Wolfram,
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:09:42 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:33:27AM -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
> >
> > See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
> > h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
>
> Adding Jean to CC. Jean, I'd think %02x would be better, what do you
> think?
Agreed, 0x%02x would be better.
If this is done then you can add:
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
> > index d3d06e3b4f3b..5cd2cf84659e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
> > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ void i2c_register_spd(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> >
> > if (!IS_ERR(i2c_new_scanned_device(adap, &info, addr_list,
> > NULL))) {
> > dev_info(&adap->dev,
> > - "Successfully instantiated SPD at 0x%hx\n",
> > + "Successfully instantiated SPD at 0x%x\n",
> > addr_list[0]);
> > dimm_count--;
> > }
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
