On 01/08/21 10:27, Mel Gorman wrote: > for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) { > - if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu)) > + if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu)) { > + /* Adjust cost of a successful scan */ > + loops <<= 2; > + > break; > + } > > - if (loops >= nr) { > + if (++loops >= nr) { > cpu = -1; > break; > } > - loops++;
Random (out of the blue) comment. Now this will increment loops before the comparison/break. ie: we're effectively doing one iteration less IIRC. Should loops be initialized to 0 instead of 1? Thanks -- Qais Yousef