There's currently a comment in the code saying function 0 is GPIO. Instead of hardcoding it, let's add a member where an SoC can specify it. No known SoCs use a number other than 0, but this just makes the code clearer. NOTE: no SoC code needs to be updated since we can rely on zero-initialization.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org> --- (no changes since v1) drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 4 ++-- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c index e051aecf95c4..1d2a78452c2d 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c @@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ static int msm_pinmux_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, if (!g->nfuncs) return 0; - /* For now assume function 0 is GPIO because it always is */ - return msm_pinmux_set_mux(pctldev, g->funcs[0], offset); + return msm_pinmux_set_mux(pctldev, + g->funcs[pctrl->soc->gpio_func], offset); } static const struct pinmux_ops msm_pinmux_ops = { diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h index 333f99243c43..e31a5167c91e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map { * @wakeirq_dual_edge_errata: If true then GPIOs using the wakeirq_map need * to be aware that their parent can't handle dual * edge interrupts. + * @gpio_func: Which function number is GPIO (usually 0). */ struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data { const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins; @@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data { const struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map *wakeirq_map; unsigned int nwakeirq_map; bool wakeirq_dual_edge_errata; + unsigned int gpio_func; }; extern const struct dev_pm_ops msm_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops; -- 2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog