* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com> [210111 05:01]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:05:28PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > @@ -350,15 +379,12 @@ static int omap4_keypad_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > error = omap4_keypad_check_revision(&pdev->dev,
> > keypad_data);
> > - if (!error) {
> > - /* Ensure device does not raise interrupts */
> > - omap4_keypad_stop(keypad_data);
> > - }
> > -
> > - pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>
> Why are we moving this down? The idea was to make sure the power usage
> counters are correct even if we exit probe early.
Yes you are right, omap4_keypad_close() won't help with balancing the
get if we exit early.
> Can we call pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
> here?
Yes that should work as there's no more register access during the probe.
Regards,
Tony
