From: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>

commit 0aa171e9b267ce7c52d3a3df7bc9c1fc0203dec5 upstream.

Pavel reports that commit 17858b140bf4 ("crypto: ecdh - avoid unaligned
accesses in ecdh_set_secret()") fixes one problem but introduces another:
the unconditional memcpy() introduced by that commit may overflow the
target buffer if the source data is invalid, which could be the result of
intentional tampering.

So check params.key_size explicitly against the size of the target buffer
before validating the key further.

Fixes: 17858b140bf4 ("crypto: ecdh - avoid unaligned accesses in 
ecdh_set_secret()")
Reported-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 crypto/ecdh.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/crypto/ecdh.c
+++ b/crypto/ecdh.c
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ static int ecdh_set_secret(struct crypto
        struct ecdh params;
        unsigned int ndigits;
 
-       if (crypto_ecdh_decode_key(buf, len, &params) < 0)
+       if (crypto_ecdh_decode_key(buf, len, &params) < 0 ||
+           params.key_size > sizeof(ctx->private_key))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        ndigits = ecdh_supported_curve(params.curve_id);


Reply via email to