On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:28:39PM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote: > We don't actually care about the value, since the kernel will panic > before that; but a value should nonetheless be returned, otherwise the > compiler will complain. > > Fixes: 8112c4f140fa ("seccomp: remove 2-phase API") > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 4.7+ > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
Ah, yes, thanks. What was the build config where this actually got exposed? > --- > kernel/seccomp.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c > index 952dc1c90229..63b40d12896b 100644 > --- a/kernel/seccomp.c > +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c > @@ -1284,6 +1284,8 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const > struct seccomp_data *sd, > const bool recheck_after_trace) > { > BUG(); > + > + return -1; > } > #endif > > -- > 2.29.2 > -- Kees Cook