On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:11 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > If you aren't even motivated to fix the problems that have been reported, > > then SLUB isn't even a _potential_ solution, it's purely a problem, and > > since I am not IN THE LEAST interested in having three different > > allocators around, SLUB is going to get axed. > > Not motivated? I have analyzed the problem in detail and when it comes > down to it there is not much impact that I can see in real life > applications. I have always responded to the regression reported also via > TPC-C.
But you are dismissing the hackbench regression, which is not a small one. It runs an astonishing 10x slower. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
