Hi, On Dec 22, 2007 1:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yep, and i ran a quick comparison test on a 2-core box with 3 kernels: > > [ best of 5 runs in a row which had a relative jitter of less than 10% ] > > MIN v2.6.24.slab v2.6.24.slub v2.6.24.slub.fix > ---------------------------------------------------------- > mmap: 429.00 402.00 ( -6%) 385.00 (-10%) > select: 11.38 10.46 ( -8%) 11.41 ( 0%) > proc-exec: 121.52 116.77 ( -3%) 120.77 ( 0%) > proc-fork: 106.84 106.19 ( 0%) 107.92 ( 1%) > syscall-open: 3.09 3.13 ( 1%) 3.25 ( 4%) > hackbench-50: 2.85 3.47 ( 21%) 2.88 ( 1%) > > and the regression seems to be largely fixed! Not only is the hackbench > one fixed, but mmap shows an above-noise improvement as well. > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I thought it might be a bug but couldn't figure it out. The patch looks good to me too, Christoph. Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Dec 22, 2007 1:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And i hereby nominate Pekka as SLUB/SLAB co-maintainer and spokesperson > ;-) Heh, thanks, but grep me from MAINTAINERS some day, Ingo :-). Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/