While I agree that this is probably only a win for very specialized tasks, I'd be interested in seeing this patch implemented on a NUMA machine, with one runqueue per node... anybody willing to try it? I don't have access to one. How about from the Linux Scalability project at SGI? any comments? john.c -- John Clemens http://www.deater.net/john [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 7175925, IM: PianoManO8 "I Hate Quotes" -- Samuel L. Clemens - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue ... Davide Libenzi
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler upd... Davide Libenzi
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update David Lang
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mark Hahn
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Davide Libenzi
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update John Clemens
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Gerhard Mack
- Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update Jun Nakajima
- Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Jesse Pollard