On 1/12/21 8:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:04:23 +0800
Liu Peibao <[email protected]> wrote:
Fix warning found by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Liu Peibao <[email protected]>
---
init/main.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index 6feee7f11eaf..1e492de770c8 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -1470,8 +1470,7 @@ static int __ref kernel_init(void *unused)
!try_to_run_init_process("/bin/sh"))
return 0;
- panic("No working init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. "
- "See Linux Documentation/admin-guide/init.rst for guidance.");
+ panic("No working init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. See Linux
Documentation/admin-guide/init.rst for guidance.");
Sorry, we don't add changes to the kernel that checkpatch warns about.
checkpatch should only be run on new code. Please do not submit any patches
on existing code because checkpatch warns about it.
-- Steve
Thanks for your replay! I get it.
But I still feel a little confused that we use different standard to
measure the existing code and the new code. I also checked some commits,
there are similar patches too.
BR,
Peibao
}
/* Open /dev/console, for stdin/stdout/stderr, this should never fail */
