Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, > > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >> Hi Jean, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-phili...@linaro.org] >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.th...@huawei.com> >>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.au...@redhat.com>; wangxingang >>> <wangxinga...@huawei.com>; Xieyingtai <xieying...@huawei.com>; >>> k...@vger.kernel.org; m...@kernel.org; j...@8bytes.org; w...@kernel.org; >>> io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >>> vivek.gau...@arm.com; alex.william...@redhat.com; >>> zhangfei....@linaro.org; robin.mur...@arm.com; >>> kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger....@gmail.com; Zengtao (B) >>> <prime.z...@hisilicon.com>; qubingbing <qubingb...@hisilicon.com> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with >>> unmanaged ASIDs >>> >>> Hi Shameer, >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related >>> patches >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin >>>> of >>> Eric's series? >>>> Please share your thoughts. >>> >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches >>> based on mainline? >> >> Yes. >> >> The uacce-devel branches from >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there.
Thanks Eric >> >> Thanks. >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make >> sense >> to rebase on top of either of those? >> >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. > > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) > > Thanks > > Eric >> >> Thanks, >> Shameer >> >>> Thanks, >>> Jean >> > > _______________________________________________ > iommu mailing list > io...@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu >