On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> > Redone with big enough swap by requests.
> > 2.4.0,132MB swap
> > 548.81user 128.97system 11:22 99%CPU (442433major+705419minor)
> > 561.12user 171.06system 12:29 97%CPU (446949major+712525minor)
> > 625.68user 2833.29system 1:12:38 79%CPU (638957major+1463974minor)
> > ===========
> > 2.4.1pre8,132MB swap
> > 548.71user 117.93system 11:09 99%CPU (442434major+705420minor)
> > 558.93user 166.82system 12:20 98%CPU (446941major+712662minor)
> > 621.37user 2592.54system 1:07:33 79%CPU (592679major+1311442minor)
>
> Better, could you try with the number changes that Andrea suggested
> too? Thanks.
Helped intensive swapping a bit, degraded other cases [no or slight
swapping].
2.4.1pre8,32MB RAM,132MB swap,blk suggestion
544.19user 141.25system 11:31 99%CPU (442419major+705411minor)
554.83user 191.57system 12:41 98%CPU (445762major+710409minor)
612.05user 2551.37system 1:07:21 78%CPU (589623major+1313665minor)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
