On 1/16/21 10:21 AM, Qais Yousef wrote:
Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check
we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint.

Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.you...@arm.com>
---
  .../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h      |  6 +++++
  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   | 21 ++++++++++++++-
  .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |  6 +++++
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c  | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c  | 10 +++++++
  5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
index b83ea448bc79..89c6d58e5dd6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(bpf_testmod_test_read,
                  __entry->pid, __entry->comm, __entry->off, __entry->len)
  );
+/* A bare tracepoint with no event associated with it */
+DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_test_write_bare,
+       TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx 
*ctx),
+       TP_ARGS(task, ctx)
+);
+
  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_EVENTS_H */
#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 2df19d73ca49..e900adad2276 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -28,9 +28,28 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject 
*kobj,
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_read);
  ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_read, ERRNO);
+noinline ssize_t
+bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
+                     struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
+                     char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
+{
+       struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx ctx = {
+               .buf = buf,
+               .off = off,
+               .len = len,
+       };
+
+       trace_bpf_testmod_test_write_bare(current, &ctx);
+
+       return -EIO; /* always fail */
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_write);
+ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_write, ERRNO);
+
  static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = {

Do we need to remove __ro_after_init?

-       .attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0444, },
+       .attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0666, },
        .read = bpf_testmod_test_read,
+       .write = bpf_testmod_test_write,
  };
static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
index b81adfedb4f6..b3892dc40111 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -11,4 +11,10 @@ struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx {
        size_t len;
  };
+struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx {
+       char *buf;
+       loff_t off;
+       size_t len;
+};
+
  #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
index 50796b651f72..e4605c0b5af1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c
@@ -21,9 +21,34 @@ static int trigger_module_test_read(int read_sz)
        return 0;
  }
+static int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz)
+{
+       int fd, err;

Init err = 0?

+       char *buf = malloc(write_sz);
+
+       if (!buf)
+               return -ENOMEM;

Looks like we already non-negative value, so return ENOMEM?

+
+       memset(buf, 'a', write_sz);
+       buf[write_sz-1] = '\0';
+
+       fd = open("/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod", O_WRONLY);
+       err = -errno;
+       if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", err))
+               goto out;

Change the above to
        fd = open("/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod", O_WRONLY);
        if (CHECK(fd < 0, "testmod_file_open", "failed: %d\n", errno)) {
                err = -errno;
                goto out;
        }

+
+       write(fd, buf, write_sz);
+       close(fd);
+out:
+       free(buf);
+

No need for extra line here.

+       return 0;

return err.

+}
+
  void test_module_attach(void)
  {
        const int READ_SZ = 456;
+       const int WRITE_SZ = 457;
        struct test_module_attach* skel;
        struct test_module_attach__bss *bss;
        int err;
@@ -48,8 +73,10 @@ void test_module_attach(void)
/* trigger tracepoint */
        ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(READ_SZ), "trigger_read");
+       ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_write(WRITE_SZ), "trigger_write");
ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_read_sz, READ_SZ, "raw_tp");
+       ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_bare_write_sz, WRITE_SZ, "raw_tp_bare");
        ASSERT_EQ(bss->tp_btf_read_sz, READ_SZ, "tp_btf");
        ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry");
        ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_manual_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry_manual");
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
index efd1e287ac17..bd37ceec5587 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c
@@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp,
        return 0;
  }
+__u32 raw_tp_bare_write_sz = 0;
+
+SEC("raw_tp/bpf_testmod_test_write_bare")
+int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp_bare,
+            struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx 
*write_ctx)
+{
+       raw_tp_bare_write_sz = BPF_CORE_READ(write_ctx, len);
+       return 0;
+}
+
  __u32 tp_btf_read_sz = 0;
SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_read")

Reply via email to