On 1/15/2021 8:13 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 24 Dec 05:12 CST 2020, Roja Rani Yarubandi wrote:@@ -629,6 +658,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused geni_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = dev_get_drvdata(dev);disable_irq(gi2c->irq);+ + /* Drop the assigned performance state */ + if (gi2c->assigned_pstate) { + ret = dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, 0); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set performance state\n"); + return ret; + } + } +Ulf, Viresh, I think we discussed this at the time of introducing the performance states. The client's state does not affect if its performance_state should be included in the calculation of the aggregated performance_state, so each driver that needs to keep some minimum performance state needs to have these two snippets. Would it not make sense to on enable/disable re-evaluate the performance_state and potentially reconfigure the hardware automatically?
I agree, this will be repeated across multiple drivers which would need some minimal vote while they are active, handling this during genpd enable/disable in genpd core makes sense.
Regards, Bjornret = geni_se_resources_off(&gi2c->se); if (ret) { enable_irq(gi2c->irq); @@ -654,6 +693,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused geni_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) if (ret) return ret;+ /* Set the assigned performance state */+ if (gi2c->assigned_pstate) { + ret = dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dev, + gi2c->assigned_pstate); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set performance state\n"); + return ret; + } + } + enable_irq(gi2c->irq); gi2c->suspended = 0; return 0; -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
-- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

