On 18-01-21, 04:13, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Make set_performance_state() callback optional in order to remove the
> need from power domain drivers to implement a dummy callback. If callback
> isn't implemented by a GENPD driver, then the performance state is passed
> to the parent domain.
>
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 9a14eedacb92..a3e1bfc233d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -339,9 +339,11 @@ static int _genpd_set_performance_state(struct
> generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - ret = genpd->set_performance_state(genpd, state);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err;
> + if (genpd->set_performance_state) {
> + ret = genpd->set_performance_state(genpd, state);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> + }
Earlier in this routine we also have this:
if (!parent->set_performance_state)
continue;
Should we change that too ?
>
> genpd->performance_state = state;
> return 0;
> @@ -399,9 +401,6 @@ int dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(struct device
> *dev, unsigned int state)
> if (!genpd)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (unlikely(!genpd->set_performance_state))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> if (WARN_ON(!dev->power.subsys_data ||
> !dev->power.subsys_data->domain_data))
> return -EINVAL;
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
--
viresh
