The 3rd LED on this board is something like a power-led, it is on all the
time. With this change to the leds-wrap driver it is possible to use this
LED too.

Signed-off-by: Michael Loeffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Hi

I wonder why there was no support for this LED. This LED and the GPIO
line is documented in the first commit message (0d75565f) for this file.

I use this changed version for five weeks and it just works. I think this
patch can be included in 2.6.25.

bye

PS: I'm not subscribed to the lkml, so please Cc me.

 drivers/leds/leds-wrap.c |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-wrap.c b/drivers/leds/leds-wrap.c
index 27fb2d8..254e426 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-wrap.c
@@ -19,11 +19,21 @@
 #include <linux/scx200_gpio.h>
 
 #define DRVNAME "wrap-led"
+#define WRAP_POWER_LED_GPIO    2
 #define WRAP_ERROR_LED_GPIO    3
-#define        WRAP_EXTRA_LED_GPIO     18
+#define WRAP_EXTRA_LED_GPIO    18
 
 static struct platform_device *pdev;
 
+static void wrap_power_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
+               enum led_brightness value)
+{
+       if (value)
+               scx200_gpio_set_low(WRAP_POWER_LED_GPIO);
+       else
+               scx200_gpio_set_high(WRAP_POWER_LED_GPIO);
+}
+
 static void wrap_error_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
                enum led_brightness value)
 {
@@ -42,6 +52,11 @@ static void wrap_extra_led_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
                scx200_gpio_set_high(WRAP_EXTRA_LED_GPIO);
 }
 
+static struct led_classdev wrap_power_led = {
+       .name           = "wrap:power",
+       .brightness_set = wrap_power_led_set,
+};
+
 static struct led_classdev wrap_error_led = {
        .name           = "wrap:error",
        .brightness_set = wrap_error_led_set,
@@ -56,6 +71,7 @@ static struct led_classdev wrap_extra_led = {
 static int wrap_led_suspend(struct platform_device *dev,
                pm_message_t state)
 {
+       led_classdev_suspend(&wrap_power_led);
        led_classdev_suspend(&wrap_error_led);
        led_classdev_suspend(&wrap_extra_led);
        return 0;
@@ -63,6 +79,7 @@ static int wrap_led_suspend(struct platform_device *dev,
 
 static int wrap_led_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
+       led_classdev_resume(&wrap_power_led);
        led_classdev_resume(&wrap_error_led);
        led_classdev_resume(&wrap_extra_led);
        return 0;
@@ -76,17 +93,31 @@ static int wrap_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        int ret;
 
+       ret = led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &wrap_power_led);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
        ret = led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &wrap_error_led);
-       if (ret == 0) {
-               ret = led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &wrap_extra_led);
-               if (ret < 0)
-                       led_classdev_unregister(&wrap_error_led);
-       }
+       if (ret < 0)
+               goto err1;
+
+       ret = led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &wrap_extra_led);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               goto err2;
+
+       return ret;
+
+err2:
+       led_classdev_unregister(&wrap_error_led);
+err1:
+       led_classdev_unregister(&wrap_power_led);
+
        return ret;
 }
 
 static int wrap_led_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+       led_classdev_unregister(&wrap_power_led);
        led_classdev_unregister(&wrap_error_led);
        led_classdev_unregister(&wrap_extra_led);
        return 0;
-- 
1.5.3.7.1112.g9758e


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to