> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com>
> Sent: 2021年1月19日 18:04
> To: pet...@infradead.org; mi...@redhat.com; a...@kernel.org;
> mark.rutl...@arm.com; alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com;
> jo...@redhat.com; namhy...@kernel.org; irog...@google.com;
> kj...@linux.ibm.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@openeuler.org; Joakim Zhang
> <qiangqing.zh...@nxp.com>; John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] perf metricgroup: Fix system PMU metrics
> 
> Joakim reports that getting "perf stat" for multiple system PMU metrics
> segfaults:
> ./perf stat -a -I 1000 -M imx8mm_ddr_write.all,imx8mm_ddr_write.all
> Segmentation fault
> 
> While the same works without issue for a single metric.
> 
> The logic in metricgroup__add_metric_sys_event_iter() is broken, in that
> add_metric() @m argument should be NULL for each new metric. Fix by not
> passing a holder for that, and rather make local in
> metricgroup__add_metric_sys_event_iter().
> 
> Fixes: be335ec28efa ("perf metricgroup: Support adding metrics for system
> PMUs")
> Reported-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zh...@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com>

root@imx8mmevk:~# ./perf stat -a -I 1000 -M 
imx8mm_ddr_read.all,imx8mm_ddr_write                                            
                                                        .all
#           time             counts unit events
     1.001446500              40832      imx8mm_ddr.read_cycles    #    638.0 
KB  imx8mm_ddr_read.all
     1.001446500              16973      imx8mm_ddr.write_cycles   #    265.2 
KB  imx8mm_ddr_write.all
     2.003150250              28836      imx8mm_ddr.read_cycles    #    450.6 
KB  imx8mm_ddr_read.all
     2.003150250               6705      imx8mm_ddr.write_cycles   #    104.8 
KB  imx8mm_ddr_write.all

For this issue, Tested-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zh...@nxp.com>

Hi John,

It seems have other issue compared to 5.10 kernel after switching to this 
framework, below metric can't work.
"MetricExpr": "(( imx8_ddr0@read\\-cycles@ + imx8_ddr0@write\\-cycles@ ) * 4 * 
4 / duration_time) / (750 * 1000000 * 4 * 4)"
After change to:
"MetricExpr": "(( imx8mm_ddr.read_cycles + imx8mm_ddr.write_cycles ) * 4 * 4 / 
duration_time) / (750 * 1000000 * 4 * 4)",


Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c 
> index
> ee94d3e8dd65..2e60ee170abc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> @@ -766,7 +766,6 @@ int __weak arch_get_runtimeparam(struct pmu_event
> *pe __maybe_unused)  struct metricgroup_add_iter_data {
>       struct list_head *metric_list;
>       const char *metric;
> -     struct metric **m;
>       struct expr_ids *ids;
>       int *ret;
>       bool *has_match;
> @@ -1058,12 +1057,13 @@ static int
> metricgroup__add_metric_sys_event_iter(struct pmu_event *pe,
>                                                 void *data)
>  {
>       struct metricgroup_add_iter_data *d = data;
> +     struct metric *m = NULL;
>       int ret;
> 
>       if (!match_pe_metric(pe, d->metric))
>               return 0;
> 
> -     ret = add_metric(d->metric_list, pe, d->metric_no_group, d->m, NULL,
> d->ids);
> +     ret = add_metric(d->metric_list, pe, d->metric_no_group, &m, NULL,
> +d->ids);
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
> 
> @@ -1114,7 +1114,6 @@ static int metricgroup__add_metric(const char
> *metric, bool metric_no_group,
>                               .metric_list = &list,
>                               .metric = metric,
>                               .metric_no_group = metric_no_group,
> -                             .m = &m,
>                               .ids = &ids,
>                               .has_match = &has_match,
>                               .ret = &ret,
> --
> 2.26.2

Reply via email to