On 1/6/21 11:15 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > We will start building overlays for platforms soon in the kernel and > would need these tools going forward. Lets start building them. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > --- > scripts/dtc/Makefile | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/dtc/Makefile b/scripts/dtc/Makefile > index 4852bf44e913..c607980a5c17 100644 > --- a/scripts/dtc/Makefile > +++ b/scripts/dtc/Makefile > @@ -1,12 +1,18 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > # scripts/dtc makefile > > -hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_DTC) += dtc > +hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_DTC) += dtc fdtdump fdtoverlay > hostprogs-always-$(CHECK_DT_BINDING) += dtc > > dtc-objs := dtc.o flattree.o fstree.o data.o livetree.o treesource.o \ > srcpos.o checks.o util.o > dtc-objs += dtc-lexer.lex.o dtc-parser.tab.o > +fdtdump-objs := fdtdump.o util.o > +
# The upstream project builds libfdt as a separate library. We are choosing to # instead directly link the libfdt object files into fdtoverly > +libfdt_dir = libfdt > +libfdt-objs := fdt.o fdt_ro.o fdt_wip.o fdt_sw.o fdt_rw.o fdt_strerror.o > fdt_empty_tree.o fdt_addresses.o fdt_overlay.o > +libfdt = $(addprefix $(libfdt_dir)/,$(libfdt-objs)) > +fdtoverlay-objs := $(libfdt) fdtoverlay.o util.o > > # Source files need to get at the userspace version of libfdt_env.h to > compile > HOST_EXTRACFLAGS += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/libfdt > In general, I am a proponent of using shared libraries (which the upstream project builds by default) because if a security bug in the library is fixed, it is fixed for all users of the library. In this specific case, I actually prefer the implementation that the patch provides (directly linking the library object files into fdtoverlay, which uses the library) because it is the only user of the library _and_ fdtoverlay will not inadvertently use the system wide libfdt if it happens to be installed (as it is on my system). Any thoughts on this Rob? -Frank
