On 1/19/21 7:10 PM, Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:33:03PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Minor thing, we should make up our mind if we want to call stuff >> internally "memhp_" or "mhp". I prefer the latter, because it is shorter. > > I would rather use the latter as well. I used that in [1]. Okay, will change all that is 'memhp' as 'mhp' instead. > MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE should be renamed if we agree on that. > > [1] > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/cover/[email protected]/ > >
