On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:10:46PM +0000, vincent.donnef...@arm.com wrote:
> @@ -157,26 +162,24 @@ static int cpuhp_invoke_callback(unsigned int cpu, enum
> cpuhp_state state,
>
> if (st->fail == state) {
> st->fail = CPUHP_INVALID;
> -
> - if (!(bringup ? step->startup.single : step->teardown.single))
> - return 0;
> -
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> + if (cpuhp_step_empty(bringup, step)) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + return 0;
> + }
This changes the behaviour of fail.. might be best to refactor without
changing behaviour.
Lemme continue reading.
