On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:32:16PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Rich!
> 
> I have tested or acked the following patches which are fine from my point of 
> view.
> 
> "Tested" means I have built and booted a current kernel with the patch in 
> question,
> "acked" means, I have looked over the patch and consider the changes to be 
> correct
> in the case where testing was not possible since the changes affect other SH 
> hardware
> I cannot test at the moment.
> 
> Here the list:
> 
> - [PATCH] [sh] fix trivial misannotations
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160945707001399&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: check return code of request_irq
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160867050030140&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: boards: Fix the cacography in irq.c
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=160578410511403&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH v1] sh: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=160578410511403&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH 1/2] sh: boot: add intermediate vmlinux.bin* to targets instead of 
> extra-y
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=161088234517301&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH 2/2] sh: boot: avoid unneeded rebuilds under arch/sh/boot/compressed/
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=161088245817344&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] arch: sh: remove duplicate include
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160488997017438&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] maple: fix wrong return value of maple_bus_init().
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160635878212678&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: kdump: add some attribute to function
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160758311622653&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: kernel: traps: remove unused variable
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160760435528709&w=2
> 
> - [PATCH] sh: Remove unused HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS macro
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=160247465514800&w=2
> 
> I will check later whether there are more patches we might have forgotten.

Hi! Thanks for the list. From the names, I think some overlap with the
pending set in linux-next (ending at a118584e7e60) that I'm about to
send as a PR.

Rich

Reply via email to