On 21.01.21 16:14, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Turns out that the bit 61 in the TEID is not always 1 and if that's
> the case the address space ID and the address are
> unpredictable. Without an address and its address space ID we can't
> export memory and hence we can only send a SIGSEGV to the process or
> panic the kernel depending on who caused the exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <fran...@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 084ea4d611a3d ("s390/mm: add (non)secure page access exceptions
> handlers")
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
we should let it run in our CI for some days, though.
> ---
> arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> index e30c7c781172..3e8685ad938d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> @@ -791,6 +791,20 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
> struct page *page;
> int rc;
>
> + /* There are cases where we don't have a TEID. */
> + if (!(regs->int_parm_long & 0x4)) {
> + /*
> + * When this happens, userspace did something that it
> + * was not supposed to do, e.g. branching into secure
> + * memory. Trigger a segmentation fault.
> + */
> + if (user_mode(regs)) {
> + send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
> + return;
> + } else
> + panic("Unexpected PGM 0x3d with TEID bit 61=0");
> + }
> +
> switch (get_fault_type(regs)) {
> case USER_FAULT:
> mm = current->mm;
>
