On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:46 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:31:20AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:26 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 05:32:43PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > In this specific case, find_func_by_offset returns NULL for
> > > > > .text..L.cfi.jumptable.43 at addend 0x8, because Clang doesn't emit
> > > > > jump table symbols for static functions:
> > > > >
> > > > > 0000000000000000 <__typeid__ZTSFjmiE_global_addr>:
> > > > >    0:   e9 00 00 00 00          jmpq   5 
> > > > > <__typeid__ZTSFjmiE_global_addr+0x5>
> > > > >                         1: R_X86_64_PLT32       io_serial_in-0x4
> > > > >    5:   cc                      int3
> > > > >    6:   cc                      int3
> > > > >    7:   cc                      int3
> > > > >    8:   e9 00 00 00 00          jmpq   d 
> > > > > <__typeid__ZTSFjmiE_global_addr+0xd>
> > > > >                         9: R_X86_64_PLT32       mem32_serial_in-0x4
> > > > >    d:   cc                      int3
> > > > >    e:   cc                      int3
> > > > >    f:   cc                      int3
> > > > >
> > > > > Nick, do you remember if there were plans to change this?
> > > >
> > > > Do you have a link to any previous discussion to help jog my mind; I
> > > > don't really remember this one.
> > > >
> > > > Is it that `__typeid__ZTSFjmiE_global_addr` is the synthesized jump
> > > > table, and yet there is no `__typeid__ZTSFjmiE_global_addr` entry in
> > > > the symbol table?
> > >
> > > I think he means there's not a 'mem32_serial_in.cfi_jt' symbol at
> > > '__typeid__ZTSFjmiE_global_addr+8'.  Probably more aggressive symbol
> > > pruning from the assembler.
> > >
> > > It's fine though.  I just need to rewrite the CFI support a bit.
> > >
> > > But that can come later.  For now I'll just drop the two CFI-related
> > > patches from this set so I can merge the others next week.
> > >
> >
> > Two CFI-related patches?
> >
> > What's the other than "objtool: Add CONFIG_CFI_CLANG support"?
>
> I was referring to patches 10 and 11:
>
>   objtool: Move unsuffixed symbol conversion to a helper function
>   objtool: Add CONFIG_CFI_CLANG support
>

OK, thanks.

I will test with a revert of these two patches in another scenario
where I have problems with Clang's IAS but not with GNU AS.

- Sedat -

> You can just drop those patches from your testing (and don't test with
> CFI).
>
> > Do you plan (or offer) a v3 of objtool-vmlinux?
>
> Not unless there are any more comments.
>
> --
> Josh
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clang Built Linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clang-built-linux+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20210123024634.qu62tyq3nkqusken%40treble.

Reply via email to