On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:39:44 +0100 Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> wrote:
> s/timetamping/timestamping/ > > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> Applied, Thanks, Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c > b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c > index eee30130ae23..802f9ae04cf4 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_buffer.c > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ irqreturn_t st_sensors_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p) > s64 timestamp; > > /* > - * If we do timetamping here, do it before reading the values, because > + * If we do timestamping here, do it before reading the values, because > * once we've read the values, new interrupts can occur (when using > * the hardware trigger) and the hw_timestamp may get updated. > * By storing it in a local variable first, we are safe.
