On Mon 25 Jan 08:51 CST 2021, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:

> Il 25/01/21 11:40, Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
> > On 18/01/2021 18:45, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > Il 18/01/21 18:21, Stanimir Varbanov ha scritto:
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c 
> > > > > b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
[..]
> > > > > +     .fwname = "qcom/venus-4.4/venus.mdt",
[..]
> > This patch can't be merged unless there is a corresponding firmware 
> > available
> > in linux-firmware. Is the current 4.2 firmware in linux-firmware signed by
> > Qualcomm? Can they provided 4.4 firmware as well?
> > 
> 
> If there is such issue, then maybe we should do "something" about it: I
> would then propose to remove all references to fwname and just get this
> done in DT, where every qcom board already specifies its own path for
> its own firmware.
> 

We have the same problem with production devices on e.g. SDM845, where
the firmware referenced by fw_name and present in linux-firmware won't
work on any real devices.

As such, providing means for specifying the firmware name in DT would be
a very reasonable thing, and in line with how we handle this in other
subsystems (using the firmware-name property, containing the full
relative path).

Regards,
Bjorn

Reply via email to