On Monday 31 December 2007 19:37:43 Torsten Kaiser wrote: > The base problem is that there already are many options to break > external modules. (CONFIG_MODULES=n ;) )
Exactly. There already are enough ways to break external modules. No need to introduce more. ;) > The question I can't answer in this context is: Do distributions want > to support external modules? > Only if yes, your argument is valid. But then they could just disable > this feature and prevent this kind of bugreports. That's my point. Nobody will risk bugs to save a few bytes of memory. -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
