On 1/20/21 7:23 PM, Can Guo wrote: > Current task management request send/compl implementation is broken, the > problems and fixes are listed as below: > > Problem: TMR completion timeout. ufshcd_tmc_handler() calls > blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(fn == ufshcd_compl_tm()), but since > blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() only iterates over all reserved tags and > started requests, so ufshcd_compl_tm() never gets a chance to run. > Fix: Call blk_mq_start_request() in __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(). > > Problem: Race condition in send/compl paths. ufshcd_compl_tm() looks for > all 0 bits in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL and call complete() > for each req who has the req->end_io_data set. There can be a race > condition btw tmc send/compl, because req->end_io_data is set, in > __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), without host lock protection, so it is > possible that when ufshcd_compl_tm() checks the req->end_io_data, > req->end_io_data is set but the corresponding tag has not been set > in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL. Thus, ufshcd_tmc_handler() may > wrongly complete TMRs which have not been sent. > Fix: Protect req->end_io_data with host lock. And let ufshcd_compl_tm() > only handle those tm cmds which have been completed instead of > looking for 0 bits in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL. > > Problem: In __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), it is not right to use hba->nutrs + > req->tag as the Task Tag in one TMR UPIU. > Fix: Directly use req->tag as Task Tag.
Please split this patch into three separate patches - one patch per problem that has been described above. Thanks, Bart.
