This block of tests was meant to find/flag incorrect use of the ":"
and "/" separators (syntax errors) and invalid (zero) group len.

However they were specified with an 8 bit width and 32 bit operations,
so they really contained two errors (EINVAL and ERANGE).

Promote them to 32 bit so it is clear what they are meant to target,
and then add tests specific for ERANGE (no syntax errors, just doing
32bit op on 8 bit width, plus a typical 9-on-8 fencepost error).

Note that the remaining "10-1" on 8 is left as-is, since that captures
the fact that we check for (r->start > r->end) ---> EINVAL before we
check for (r->end >= nbits) ---> ERANGE.  If the code is ever re-ordered
then this test will pick up the mismatched errno value.

Cc: Yury Norov <yury.no...@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
 lib/test_bitmap.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
index 4425a1dd4ef1..3d2cd3b1de84 100644
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -337,13 +337,15 @@ static const struct test_bitmap_parselist 
parselist_tests[] __initconst = {
 
        {-EINVAL, "-1", NULL, 8, 0},
        {-EINVAL, "-0", NULL, 8, 0},
-       {-EINVAL, "10-1", NULL, 8, 0},
-       {-EINVAL, "0-31:", NULL, 8, 0},
-       {-EINVAL, "0-31:0", NULL, 8, 0},
-       {-EINVAL, "0-31:0/", NULL, 8, 0},
-       {-EINVAL, "0-31:0/0", NULL, 8, 0},
-       {-EINVAL, "0-31:1/0", NULL, 8, 0},
-       {-EINVAL, "0-31:10/1", NULL, 8, 0},
+       {-EINVAL, "10-1", NULL, 8, 0},  /* (start > end) ; also ERANGE */
+       {-ERANGE, "8-8", NULL, 8, 0},
+       {-ERANGE, "0-31", NULL, 8, 0},
+       {-EINVAL, "0-31:", NULL, 32, 0},
+       {-EINVAL, "0-31:0", NULL, 32, 0},
+       {-EINVAL, "0-31:0/", NULL, 32, 0},
+       {-EINVAL, "0-31:0/0", NULL, 32, 0},
+       {-EINVAL, "0-31:1/0", NULL, 32, 0},
+       {-EINVAL, "0-31:10/1", NULL, 32, 0},
        {-EOVERFLOW, "0-98765432123456789:10/1", NULL, 8, 0},
 
        {-EINVAL, "a-31", NULL, 8, 0},
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to