On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote: > As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would > be addressed if all agree.
Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it is already there. Look for these. store_one(scaling_min_freq, min); store_one(scaling_max_freq, max); Hopefully they will work just fine. -- viresh
