On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > Currently arch_stack_wallk_reliable() is documented with an identical > comment in both x86 and S/390 implementations which is a bit redundant. > Move this to the header and convert to kerneldoc while we're at it.
Makes sense. > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <h...@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <g...@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> > Cc: Jiri Kosina <ji...@kernel.org> > Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbe...@suse.cz> > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com> > Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawre...@redhat.com> > Cc: x...@kernel.org > Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: live-patch...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbe...@suse.cz> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c > index 7f1266c24f6b..101477b3e263 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c > @@ -24,12 +24,6 @@ void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, > void *cookie, > } > } > > -/* > - * This function returns an error if it detects any unreliable features of > the > - * stack. Otherwise it guarantees that the stack trace is reliable. > - * > - * If the task is not 'current', the caller *must* ensure the task is > inactive. > - */ > int arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, > void *cookie, struct task_struct *task) > { Just a note. arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c has the same for __save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(), but it would not be nice to pollute include/linux/stacktrace.h with that in my opinion. It is an old infrastructure after all. Miroslav