It may happen that the underlying device's runtime-pm is
not controlled by block-pm. So it's possible that when
commands are sent to the device, it's suspended and may not
be resumed by blk-pm. Hence explicitly resume the parent
which is the platform device.

Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asuto...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <c...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Bao D. Nguyen <nguy...@codeaurora.org>
---
 block/bsg.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index d7bae94..e9fc896 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/idr.h>
 #include <linux/bsg.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 
 #include <scsi/scsi.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi_ioctl.h>
@@ -306,12 +307,15 @@ static struct bsg_device *bsg_get_device(struct inode 
*inode, struct file *file)
 static int bsg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
        struct bsg_device *bd;
+       struct bsg_class_device *bcd;
 
        bd = bsg_get_device(inode, file);
 
        if (IS_ERR(bd))
                return PTR_ERR(bd);
 
+       bcd = &bd->queue->bsg_dev;
+       pm_runtime_get_sync(bcd->class_dev->parent);
        file->private_data = bd;
        return 0;
 }
@@ -319,8 +323,12 @@ static int bsg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 static int bsg_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
        struct bsg_device *bd = file->private_data;
+       struct bsg_class_device *bcd;
 
        file->private_data = NULL;
+
+       bcd = &bd->queue->bsg_dev;
+       pm_runtime_put_sync(bcd->class_dev->parent);
        return bsg_put_device(bd);
 }
 
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux 
Foundation Collaborative Project.

Reply via email to