On 28.01.2021 10:59, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
Building kernel/sys_ni.c with W=1 omits tons of -Wmissing-prototypes
Emits?
warnings.
$ make W=1 kernel/sys_ni.o
[ snip ]
CC kernel/sys_ni.o
In file included from kernel/sys_ni.c:10:
./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:83:14: warning: no previous
prototype for '__x64_sys_io_setup' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
83 | __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
| ^~
./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:100:2: note: in expansion of macro
'__COND_SYSCALL'
100 | __COND_SYSCALL(x64, sys_##name)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:256:2: note: in expansion of macro
'__X64_COND_SYSCALL'
256 | __X64_COND_SYSCALL(name) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sys_ni.c:39:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COND_SYSCALL'
39 | COND_SYSCALL(io_setup);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:83:14: warning: no previous
prototype for '__ia32_sys_io_setup' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
83 | __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
| ^~
./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:120:2: note: in expansion of macro
'__COND_SYSCALL'
120 | __COND_SYSCALL(ia32, sys_##name)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:257:2: note: in expansion of macro
'__IA32_COND_SYSCALL'
257 | __IA32_COND_SYSCALL(name)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sys_ni.c:39:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COND_SYSCALL'
39 | COND_SYSCALL(io_setup);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
...
__SYS_STUB0() and __SYS_STUBx() defined a few lines above have forward
declarations. Let's do likewise for __COND_SYSCALL() to fix the
warnings.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahi...@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
index a84333adeef2..80c08c7d5e72 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ extern long __ia32_sys_ni_syscall(const struct pt_regs
*regs);
}
#define __COND_SYSCALL(abi, name) \
+ __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused); \
__weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
Aren't these two lines identical?
Ah, got it! :-)
[...]
MBR, Sergei
