On 2021-01-28 02:37, Biwen Li (OSS) wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>
Sent: 2021年1月27日 19:38
To: Biwen Li (OSS) <biwen...@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: mark.rutl...@arm.com; Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; t...@linutronix.de;
ja...@lakedaemon.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jiafei Pan
<jiafei....@nxp.com>; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Ran Wang
<ran.wan...@nxp.com>; Biwen Li <biwen...@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] irqchip: ls-extirq: add flag IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to
remove call trace

On 2021-01-27 08:58, Biwen Li wrote:
> From: Biwen Li <biwen...@nxp.com>
>
> Add flag IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to remove call trace as follow, ...
> [   45.605239] Unbalanced IRQ 120 wake disable
> [   45.609445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1124 at kernel/irq/manage.c:800
> irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> ...
> [   45.645141] pstate: 60000085 (nZCv daIf -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> [   45.651144] pc : irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> [   45.655497] lr : irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> ...
> [   45.742825] Call trace:
> [   45.745268]  irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> [   45.749278]  ds3232_resume+0x38/0x50
>
> On ls2088ardb:
> In suspend progress(# echo mem > /sys/power/state),
>
pm_suspend()->suspend_devices_and_enter()->dpm_suspend()->device_suspe
> nd()
> ->ds3232_suspend()->enable_irq_wake()->irq_set_irq_wake()
> ->set_irq_wake_real(), return -ENXIO, there get
> "Cannot set wakeup source" in ds3232_suspend().
>
> In resume progress(wakeup by flextimer)
> dpm_resume_end()->dpm_resume()
> ->device_resume()->ds3232_resume()
> ->disable_irq_wake()->irq_set_irq_wake()
> ->set_irq_wake_real(), there get
> kernel call trace(Unbalanced IRQ 120 wake
> disable)

This is again paraphrasing the stack trace instead of explaining the problem it
fixes. How about:

"The ls-extirq driver doesn't implement the irq_set_wake()
  callback, while being wake-up capable. This results in
  ugly behaviours across suspend/resume cycles.

  Advertise this by adding IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to the irqchip
  flags"

The subject line should be fixed along the same lines, and a Fixes: tag added.
Okay, got it. Thanks. Will update in v3.

... and v3 still doesn't have a Fixes: tag.

Frankly, if you can't be bothered to do this, why should I worry
about your platform being broken?

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Reply via email to