> very much care about code size. But it has been stated in this thread > that most of the _p() API uses in the kernel today are bogus. So
You missed a word "wrongly". It has been "wrongly stated" I've been going through the ISA cases which are the majority. Generally speaking they are correct. We have a couple of "interesting" PCI users who most definitely want udelay() or removal of _p. We have various chipset cases which want looking at in detail. The ISA drivers however are both the main user and mostly right. > ok, "I dont know but it might be slower" is a perfectly fine statement > instead of your original "it will be slower". If you use wall clock timings it will be slower. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
