On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:13:08AM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:00:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > Ok, no, I didn't write that patch, I'm getting very confused here. > > > > In 2.6.24-rc6 there is no usage of debugfs in the ohci driver. > > > > In the -mm tree there is a patch, from Tony Jones, that moves some debug > > code out of sysfs and into debugfs where it belongs. It does it for > > both the ehci and ohci USB host controller drivers, and this is the code > > that is incorrect if CONFIG_DEBUGFS is not enabled. > > > > So, for the 2.6.24 release, nothing needs to be changed, all is good, > > and there is no regression. > > > > Right? Or am I still confused about this whole thing? > > Probably, since I also wasn't sure about this getting added to the > post-2.6.23 regressions. I'd expect this problem to be -mm only myself, > but then I didn't actively verify it in code (and I haven't tried -rc6 > proper on that machine yet either, build takes ages ;). > OK, since I cannot really offer anything other than positive feelings about > this being non-rc6 breakage, should I try -rc6 proper, too?
Please do, that would be very helpful. As the code being discussed isn't even in Linus's tree, it's hard to see how this could be a proposed fix for the regression :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
