Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:50:56PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> > struct module *find_module(const char *name)
>> > {
>> > - module_assert_mutex();
>>
>> Does it make sense to replace the assert above with the warn below
>> (untested)?
>>
>> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(rcu_read_lock_sched_held());
>
> One caller actually holds module_mutex still. And find_module_all,
> which implements the actual logic already asserts that either
> module_mutex is held or rcu_read_lock, so I don't tink we need an
> extra one here.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
