On 01/31/2021 06:38 PM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Jinyang He wrote:
CONFIG_64BIT is confusing. N32 also pass parameters by a0~a7.
Do we have NEW kernel build?
CONFIG_64BIT assumed N64 as kernel ABI.
-Jiaxun
Hi, Jiaxun,
Thank you for your reply, and now I know. Before that, I saw the macro
from arch/mips/include/asm/regdef.h and thought it needed to be modified
here. But that seems have no sence.
Please ignore this patch.
Thanks,
Jinyang
Signed-off-by: Jinyang He <hejiny...@loongson.cn>
---
arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S b/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S
index cff52b2..808257a 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
PTR_S a1, PT_R5(sp)
PTR_S a2, PT_R6(sp)
PTR_S a3, PT_R7(sp)
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+#if _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 || _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_NABI32
PTR_S a4, PT_R8(sp)
PTR_S a5, PT_R9(sp)
PTR_S a6, PT_R10(sp)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
PTR_L a1, PT_R5(sp)
PTR_L a2, PT_R6(sp)
PTR_L a3, PT_R7(sp)
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+#if _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 || _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_NABI32
PTR_L a4, PT_R8(sp)
PTR_L a5, PT_R9(sp)
PTR_L a6, PT_R10(sp)
--
2.1.0
