On 1/28/21 9:57 PM, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2021-01-29 11:15, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 1/27/21 8:16 PM, Can Guo wrote:
>>> In __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), it is not right to use hba->nutrs +
>>> req->tag as
>>> the Task Tag in one TMR UPIU. Directly use req->tag as the Task Tag.
>>
>> Why is the current code wrong and why is this patch the proper fix?
>> Please explain this in the patch description.
>
> req->tag is the tag allocated for one TMR, no?
Hi Can,
Commit e293313262d3 ("scsi: ufs: Fix broken task management command
implementation") includes the following changes:
+ task_tag = hba->nutrs + free_slot;
task_req_upiup->header.dword_0 =
UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(UPIU_TRANSACTION_TASK_REQ, 0,
- lrbp->lun, lrbp->task_tag);
+ lun_id, task_tag);
task_req_upiup->header.dword_1 =
UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(0, tm_function, 0, 0);
As one can see the value written in dword_0 starts at hba->nutrs. Was
that code correct? If that code was correct, does your patch perhaps
break task management support?
Thanks,
Bart.
