On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:41:57 -0700 Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 02, 2008 03:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, > > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel > > offered it - and that's definitely not intended. > > > > Anyone who _really_ wants to test ext4 should anyway be able to do the > > trivial change of removing the "depends on BROKEN" line. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY > > > > config EXT4DEV_FS > > tristate "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)" > > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > > + depends on BROKEN > > select JBD2 > > select CRC16 > > help > > Isn't CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enough? Of course it is - Adrian is however trying to remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL and reality is getting in his way again -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
